Why not but it is really not the purpose of the debate

The appointment of Claude Bébéar as Chairman of the Committee of wise men is a formidable "joker". Who would dare challenge the stature of the Commander of the French employers The latter did not also out of the Jean-Marie Messier game when it was necessary, and warned that some of the excesses could be fatal in a precursor book written with Philippe manner: "They will kill capitalism" (editions Plon, 2003). But once recognized profile "indisputable" This personality, what is left

The Committee of wise men, it is proposed, is not intended to be put that is to try and anticipate certain slippages. It is simple trial and Appeal Board for those who have misinterpreted the code of conduct developed by the Ethics Committee of the Medef.

It can then ask the question of why various bodies such as the remuneration Committee, the Board of directors or the General Assembly ask anyone on votes of generally pay for convenience. Unless their members did need to take a notice to compensate for their lack of courage to oppose claims that would be made by the leaders...

The Committee of wise men is ultimately nothing more than a psychological assistance cell, therefore, a bit like Alcoholics Anonymous, to respond to a CEO who feel addicted to the stock or the Weight Watchers: "I am eating how wean me and progress."

Indirectly, it is a tribute to the employers to be measured, lucid and just a little confused before the legal complexity of the set of possible mechanisms for compensation. Why not, but it is really not the purpose of the debate. And can in this case then worry about the misunderstanding of the legal services of international groups, who are supposed to juggle with ease in the development of the most complex contracts, against international laws.

More seriously, is this a response to the challenge of capitalism more humanist who would be able to understand and accept that public opinion is essential to the social contract Can we not interpret the announced establishment of a small group of five or six large patterns as a dry and scathing response mode: "Move along, there is nothing to see."

Why our large employers, talented, and by otherwise respectable who developed groups we are proud, decided to display a contempt in this society movement that wants a gesture, a sign of understanding concerning wage inequality never achieved in the business world

Are they aware of the disappointment that they will generate Aware that policy may, at the slightest opportunity, respond by law Aware that the criticism of inbreeding reached its limit Aware that the people of entrepreneurs in the same family feels also totally excluded, swept through a stroke of a pen Is this not provocative of auto-absoudre instead of self-regulating

Even if some believe that self-regulation may not work, what risk would run to try to be somewhat proactive, to reflect on the concept of decency, the dimension of exemplary elites must be to establish and maintain the social link without which it is not possible economy and society The crisis revealed in all its brutality this requirement, which, coupled with the concept of human capital is the new essential parameter of entrepreneurship of tomorrow.

Unless a frown of Claude Bébéar is enough to to order a few misplaced... But must it frown without the requests!

This is the real issue of today, which we expect, with great concern and curiosity, a response.